Showing posts with label Daily. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daily. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Accused madam's lawyer wants lower bail - New York Daily News

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Accused East Side madam Anna Gristina was lost in the legal system for hours Monday before a Manhattan judge shot down her bid to have her $2 million bail reduced and sent her back to jail.

The smile on Gristina’s face on seeing her husband Kelvin Gorr sitting in the second row when she finally got to the courtroom — after seven plus hours in limbo — faded fast when the judge ordered her sent back to Rikers Island.

Gristina’s odyssey began at 8 a.m., when she was supposed to board the prison shuttle bus to the Manhattan courthouse.

“I wasn’t called,” she told her lawyer, sources said.

When Gristina didn’t turn up in Manhattan, her lawyers and the judge called the jail at 12:30 p.m. and were informed she was still there, sources said.

Only she wasn’t.

Gristina was already in a holding cell on the 12th floor of the courthouse complex, where she was finally located at 3:15 p.m.

Fifteen minutes later she was before Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Charles Solomon, who promptly denied her lawyer’s petition to reduce her bail from $2 million.

Gristina, 44, is accused of running a $10 million call-girl ring that operated on the upper East Side and supplied high-class hookers to wealthy johns.

Police said 30-year-old Jaynie Mae Baker allegedly booked the girls for Gristina. She is free on $100,000 bail.

Gristina’s lawyer, Gary Greenwald, argued that if Baker was allowed out that Gristina should be too.

“How does the co-defendant get $100,000 [bail\] and she went to Mexico?” Greenwald said before the hearing. “That somehow doesn't play into anything?”

Baker told prosecutors she was on vacation in Mexico when the reputed vice den was shut down in February. She and Gristina have both

pleaded not guilty to prostitution charges.

Prosecutors argued again that the Scottish-born Gristina, who lives with her family upstate, remains a flight risk. They said Gristina had wealthy customers who might be willing to help her escape to avoid having their names revealed.

Before Gristina arrived in court, her

lawyer and prosecutors sparred before another judge, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, over access to evidence.

Greenwald once again demanded that prosecutors turn over “basic” evidence like the search warrants they got to bug the alleged brothel.

“We are entitled to that,” Greenwald said.

Assistant District Attorney Elizabeth Roper said they plan to hand over that evidence but also want a protective order “for portions” of the search warrant materials.

Merchan told both sides to work something out and get back to him.

“I don’t want to get involved in gamesmanship,” Merchan said. “I don’t want to get involved in hand-holding.”

mgrace@nydailynews.com


View the original article here

Monday, April 2, 2012

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies-insurance daily

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies - Insurance Daily

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Counsel: Groom knife has self-New York Daily News

A day after that a groom Staten Island is was set aside, a lawyer of the accused killer claimed that his client acted in self-defence.

Redinel Dervishaj, 35, was arraigned Friday on charges of murder in the assault of Antonio Lacertosa, 27, during a brawl after the commitment of the victim. The Albanian gangster known, took a relative in Illinois, three days ago has pleaded not guilty and was ordered held without bail.

"I think that there are several people who were possibly address my client," lawyer Thomas Reilly, said out of Staten Island criminal court. "It looks like there's a decent case of self-defence."

The Attorney of the Court named said that dervishaj intends to testify in front of a grand jury to "tell his version of the story."

It would not comment on why his client had fled out said that criminal history alleged dervishaj does not play a role in the incident.

Workers of the Espana Restaurant and Lounge at Annadale confronted the Lacertosa crew early Saturday to urinate outside, with a Manager by pulling a gun, said sources. Dervishaj can be seen on a strip of monitoring running back in the restaurant after flows on a parked car.

Hulking, 6-foot-6 suspect kept his head down and said nothing during the brief hearing.

Relatives of the victim, that he cried a day earlier, were not present in the Court.

"He would not we to dwell on events that have brought us, but to keep alive in our hearts as happy as he was," sister of the Lacertosa Jeanine Caravuna said at the funeral.

Oyaniv@nydailynews.com

Twitter.com/NYDNBklynCt


View the original article here

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Lawyer objects to recommendation about confession - Wausau Daily Herald

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

JACKSON, Miss. (WTW) — Defense attorneys in Louisiana are objecting to a federal magistrate's recommendation to allow a jury to hear the confession of a Mississippi man declared dead in 1994 but suspected in the deaths of a Las Vegas woman and her daughter.

Thomas Steven Sanders is charged in Louisiana with kidnapping resulting in the death of 12-year-old Lexis Roberts. Her body was found in October 2010 in Catahoula Parish, La. Her mother, Suellen Roberts, was found dead the following month in Arizona.

Sanders' lawyers want U.S. District Judge Dee Drell to throw out Sanders' confession. Trial is scheduled for January.

Magistrate James Kirk in Alexandria, La., has recommended Drell allow the confession.

Sanders' lawyers filed an objection to the recommendation Wednesday. They insist Sanders asked for a lawyer and questioning should have stopped.

Sanders was declared dead in Mississippi in 1994 after he abandoned his family seven years earlier. Despite the death certificate, Sanders was able to move about easily and undetected even though he was arrested over the years, including for drug paraphernalia and a number of traffic and motor vehicle incidents, all in Tennessee. He was sentenced to two years in jail in Georgia for simple battery.

Sanders' attorneys have been trying to get the confession thrown out based on the argument that questioning continued after he asked for a lawyer.

Kirk disagrees, saying that Sanders only requested a lawyer to discuss certain questions: why he killed the mother and daughter, what he had been doing while in Nevada and whether he had worked for a mattress company.

Sanders could face the death penalty if convicted in Lexis' kidnapping and death. Authorities in Louisiana and Arizona have also said he could face state charges.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


View the original article here

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Actress' lawyer Mark Baute insists: 'We will go for re-trial' - Daily Mail

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Actress' lawyer Mark Baute insists: 'We will go for re-trial'

By Amelia Proud

PUBLISHED: 14:57 EST, 19 March 2012 | UPDATED: 18:49 EST, 19 March 2012

It's been four years since fans watched Edie Britt, the vamp of the Desperate Housewives' original five, die from electrocution in the aftermath of a dramatic car crash.

And today, Nicollette Sheridan - the actress who played the pneumatic blonde - stormed out of court in an equally compelling fashion after discovering she was just a juror away from vindication in her wrongful termination suit brought against her former bosses... and a $6 million payout.

Judge Elizabeth Allen White declared a mistrial following days of a solidly hung jury, this means that the case will have to be brought to trial again if Nicollette Sheridan wants to pursue a verdict.

Scroll down for video...

Stony-faced: Nicollette Sheridan after she stormed out of court following the mistrial verdict which cost her roughly $6 million ?Stony-faced: Nicollette Sheridan after she stormed out of court following the mistrial verdict which cost her roughly $6 million

Dramatic exit: Nicollette was up and away after the verdict was delivered but her lawyer Mark Baute stayed behind to confirm that they will continue to fight at a re-trial Dramatic exit: Nicollette was up and away after the verdict was delivered but her lawyer Mark Baute stayed behind to confirm that they will continue to fight at a re-trial Dramatic exit: Nicollette was up and away after the verdict was delivered but her lawyer Mark Baute stayed behind to confirm that they will continue to fight at a re-trial

And well, she might, considering the position of the jury at mistrial.

They were hung 8-4 in favour of her version of events: that Edie was killed because Sheridan complained about series creator Marc Cherry's behaviour towards her.

Nicollette needed just one more juror to be convinced that this is what happened for a victory verdict, and those damages of just under $6 million.

Well heeled: Nicollette has donned a couture suit with matching pumps for each day of testimony and deliberation Well heeled: Nicollette has donned a couture suit with matching pumps for each day of testimony and deliberation

She claimed that he'd given her a 'wallop' on the head during a rehearsal for a scene in 2008, he contended it was a 'tap' for direction as they worked on her character's responses.

It had seemed this argument was terminally wounded when this charge of battery against Cherry was dismissed early last week.

He was released as a defendant in the case but the issue of whether ABC and Cherry killed Edie off because of the complaint, regardless of the severity of the incident, still remained.

And the jury almost conclusively agreed with Sheridan's claims, despite Cherry and ABC bosses taking the stand over the past two weeks to insist this exit was months in the planning BEFORE this incident and subsequent complaint.

Much of the testimony focused on the timing of Cherry's decision to kill off Edie.

Ten witnesses said he made it months before the on-set incident, but two writers for the show said her fate was not sealed until after.

48-year-old Sheridan wanted at least $5.7 million from creator Marc Cherry and Touchstone Television Production.

The two-week trial offered jurors a behind-the-scenes look at the soap, which is to bow out this spring after eight seasons.

The testimony of more than a dozen writers, executives and producers was often unflattering.

There were tales of salary disputes and arguments over forgotten lines.

Sheridan said Cherry talked down to her, and he recalled her as rude, unpunctual and unprepared for rehearsals.

He also recounted her fighting with co-star Teri Hatcher over forgotten lines and said two other stars, Felicity Huffman and Eva Longoria, were 'relieved' when they learned she was leaving the show.

Vindicated... almost: Nicollette Sheridan had eight jurors behind her when a mistrial was recorded, she need one more to win Vindicated... almost: Sheridan, who was smiling hopefully as she arrived at court in LA today with lawyer Mark Baute, had eight jurors behind her when a mistrial was recorded, she need one more to win

Battled it out: Nicollette said Cherry (right) 'walloped' her but this battery charge was dismissed meaning he was not at court for the last few days Battled it out: Nicollette said Cherry (right) 'walloped' her but this battery charge was dismissed meaning he was not at court for the last few days Battled it out: Nicollette said Cherry (right) 'walloped' her but this battery charge was dismissed meaning he was not at court for the last few days

The Desperate Houswives cast: Brenda Strong, Felicity Huffman, Marcia Cross, Eva Longoria, Teri Hatcher and Nicollette The Desperate Houswives cast: Brenda Strong, Felicity Huffman, Marcia Cross, Eva Longoria, Teri Hatcher and Nicollette

Big draw: Viewers loved tuning in to watch Edie Britt's antics on Desperate Housewives Big draw: Viewers loved tuning in to watch Edie Britt's antics on Desperate Housewives



View the original article here

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Accused madam Anna Gristina's new lawyer Gary Greenwald floats idea of plea deal - New York Daily News

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Accused madam Anna Gristina’s new lawyer dangled the possibility of a plea deal on Thursday as her family scrambled to come up with $200,000 to spring her from jail.

“You always consider a plea in any case...from a murder to spitting on the sidewalk,” upstate criminal defense attorney Gary Greenwald said.

RELATED: ACCUSED MADAM HELPER FAILED TO BREAK INTO PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING, STAND-UP COMEDY

Greenwald has taken over Gristina’s case, replacing court-appointed defender Richard Siracusa and small-time civil lawyer Peter Gleason.

He also scuttled a bizarre plan by Gleason to let Gristina bunk with him at the $2.5 million Tribeca loft, which he plans to put up as collateral for bail.

Gristina is being held at Rikers in lieu of $2 million bond. She needs to come up with 10% of that in cash to get out, Greenwald said.

He said he expects to be able to post bond next week, possibly after the jailed woman’s sister takes out a loan against her home.

Prosecutors say the Monroe, N.Y., mom of four ran a $10 million call-girl ring that catered to rich and powerful men from an upper East Side brothel.

They suggested in court she has “many well-placed, well-heeled individuals” who could come up with $200,000, but quickly added those associates probably would not be approved.

Greenwald asked for bail to be reduced, denying that Gristina is a flight risk and alleging that prosecutors offered to free her if she “gave them certain information.”

He said the investigators wanted Gristina to tell them if "Mr A, Mr. B, Mr. C used my services.”

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan said he wasn’t going to second-guess the prosecutors and shot down Greenwald’s request.

Greenwald is a colorful character who served as mayor of upstate Wurtsboro and wrote a political column for a local paper.

He spent almost as much time talking to the media about the ouster of Knicks coach Mike D’Antoni as he did about Gristina’s case.

Yet unlike Gleason, who never handled a felony, Greenwald has criminal court chops; he once represented mobster Vincent (Chin) Gigante.

It’s unclear what role Gleason, who was brought into the case by private eye pal Vincent Parco, will play in the high-profile case now.

His replacement defended his offer to become roommates with his client.

"Mr. Gleason's motivation was absolutely phenomenal, of the highest level," Greenwald said.

Prosecutors took a dimmer view.

In court papers, they described the relationship between Gleason and Gristina as “murky” and mocked some of his public comments.

“Mr. Gleason also stated that he did not care whether the defendant was guilty or innocent, a sentiment one might expect from a close friend, but less so from one’s defense counsel,” they wrote in a brief.

Gleason and Greenwald have at least one thing in common.

“I like the media,” the new lawyer said before driving away from the courthouse with co-counsel Elise Rucker.


View the original article here

Friday, March 16, 2012

Counsel for accused new Madame Anna Gristina Gary Greenwald floats idea of plea agreement - New York Daily News

Ms. new counsel for Anna Gristina held out the possibility of a plea on Thursday agreement as his family scrambled to reach $200,000 in the spring of prison, she accused.

"Always consider you a plea in all cases... of murder for spitting on the sidewalk," defence lawyer criminal upstate, said Gary Greenwald.

RELATED: MADAM ACCUSED HELPER DOES NOT HAVE TO ENTER THE WRESTLING, STAND-UP COMIC

Greenwald has taken over the case of the Gristina, replacing the Court has appointed Defender Richard Siracusa and small civil lawyer Peter Gleason.

It also scuttled a bizarre plan by Gleason to leave Gristina bunk with him at the loft in Tribeca $ 2.5 million, which it intends to implement as a guarantee to the guarantor.

Gristina is held at Rikers, in lieu of the $ 2 million bond. She need to reach 10% of that money to get out, said Greenwald.

He said that he expected to be able to bail next week, perhaps after the sister of imprisoned women takes a loan against his home.

Prosecutors said that the mother of Monroe, New York, four ran a $ 10 million call-girl ring that catered to the rich and powerful of a brothel of the upper East Side men.

They suggested to the Court that it has "several very specific," which could reach $ 200,000, but quickly added that these Associates would not likely be approved.

Greenwald asks for bail reduced, denying that Gristina is a flight risk and alleging that prosecutors offered her freedom if she "gave them some information."

He said that investigators wanted Gristina to tell them if "Mr A, Mr. B, Mr. c used my services."

Justice of Supreme Court of Manhattan Juan Merchan said that he was not going to question prosecutors and shot at the request of Greenwald.

Greenwald is a colorful character who has been mayor of upstate Wurtsboro and writes a political column for a local newspaper.

He spent almost as much time speaking to the media the overthrow of the Knicks coach Mike of Antoni as it did on the cases of Gristina.

However, unlike Gleason, which never handled a felony, Greenwald has Court criminal chops; He represented once mobster Vincent (Chin) Gigante.

It is unclear what role Gleason, who was in the case by private eye pal Vincent Parco, will play in the case of high-profile now.

Its replacement has defended its offer to become roommates with his client.

"Motivation of Mr. Gleason was absolutely phenomenal, highest level," said Greenwald.

Prosecutors took a dimmer view.

In court documents, they described the relationship between Gleason and Gristina as "disorder" and fun of some of his public comments.

"Mr. Gleason said that he did not care if the defendant was guilty or innocent, a sense one might expect of a close friend, but less of the defence counsel," they wrote in a memorandum.

Gleason and Greenwald have at least one thing in common.

"I like the media", the new lawyer said before driving away from the courthouse with co-counsel Elise Rucker.


View the original article here