Showing posts with label lawyers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lawyers. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Two company injury lawyers recognized as Top 40 under 40 Trial lawyers in Virginia-PR Web (press release)

Virginia Beach, VA (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

The national Trial lawyers has selected Virginia injury attorneys Emily Mapp Brannon and Kevin Duffan, associates with the Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton law firm, for inclusion in the "Top 40 under 40 process lawyers in Virginia.

The national Trial lawyers Top 40 under 40 is a professional organization comprised of America's top young trial lawyers. Membership in the Top 40 under 40 Association is by invitation only and is limited to lawyers under the age of 40 who are chosen by a comprehensive selection process that includes peer nominations and third-party research. These lawyers have selected excelled in the courtroom, superior qualifications and leadership as young lawyers process are displayed.

This means in fact, Emily and Kevin are some of the best personal injury lawyers in Virginia under the age of 40.

Our law firm Virginia personal injury is proud that Emily and Kevin were selected for this prestigious honor. They represent our company commitment to excellence and willingness to advocate for our client's rights from the first pleading quite at a jury trial, if necessary.

Emily and Kevin's performance comes on the heels of the company is selected as one of the best personal injury law firms in Virginia for 2011-2012 & by U.s. News World Report.



View the original article here

National Trial lawyers Top 40 under 40 Rachel Roman joins the St. Louis ...-PR Web (press release)

St. Louis, MO (PRWEB), 07 April 2012

St. Louis trial lawyer Rachel Roman is an associate with the Law Firm Zevan and Davidson. Rachel has successfully cases in the area of product liability, medical malpractice, wrongful death, personal injury, premises liability and toxic torts litigated.

Rachel earned her undergraduate degree in Nursing of Loyola University-Chicago in 2001. Prior to law school, she worked as an emergency room nurse in level 1 trauma centers in Chicago.

She graduated in 2006 at Saint Louis University School of Law. During law school, Rachel earned a certificate in health law, was a managing editor of the Saint Louis University Journal of health law, and worked as a legal extern for the u.s. Attorney's Office in healthcare fraud abuse & Division. Rachel is to practice in Missouri and Illinois and the u.s. District Courts in the Eastern District of Missouri, licensed for Western District of Missouri and Southern District of Illinois.

Rachel was a Super lawyer Rising Star in Missouri named in 2009 and 2010. In 2012, she was by the National Association of lawyers of the Trial lawyer named as a Top 40 under the age of 40 in Missouri.

In addition to her work for the benefit of clients and Davidson is a member with Zevan Rachel the Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys, the female lawyers association of St. Louis, the American Association for Justice, the American Bar Association, and the Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis. Rachel has taught for lawyers in the areas of traumatic brain injury and Anatomy and physiology.

St. Louis personal injury lawyers and medical malpractice lawyers

The Zevan Davidson Law Firm specialize in medical malpractice and personal injury cases in Missouri, several multi-million dollar lawsuits on behalf of harmed clients have won. They understand the importance of diligence and sensitivity in the treatment of medical malpractice and personal injury cases. Therefore, able to aggressively pursuing justice and Zevan and Davidson fee payable for the injured, while still protecting their emotional and physical health.



View the original article here

Sacramento personal injury lawyers to Open Demas Law Group-PR Web (press release)

Sacramento, California (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

A team of Sacramento injury lawyers goes on a new course by forming the Demas Law Group. The company began operation under this name in March of 2012. The firms primary mission is to serve the Sacramento Community in a wide range of personal injury matters. The company consists of Sacramento personal injury lawyers that decades of collective experience helping injured clients in California.

The Demas Law Group will be led by John n. Demas. Mr. Demas has successfully handled personal injury cases in the Sacramento area for twenty years, including wrongful death, catastrophic damage and claims for defective products. He has represented victims of car accidents, trucking, and construction. Mr. Demas has a reputation with lawyers, clients and insurance companies as well as a vigilant advocate for injured victims. His skill and expertise have resulted in some of the largest judgments in Sacramento County history. He has been selected by his peers as Super lawyer for 2009, 2010 and 2011 Northern California, an exclusive honor limited to less than 5% of all lawyers, and approximately 1% of plaintiff personal injury lawyers. He was recently recognized as the questioning Attorney/advocate of the year by the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association, in recognition of his extraordinary trial results and intrepid work in advocating for the rights of consumers. In addition, Mr. Demas has granted membership to The American Board of Trial advocates (ABOTA), and has a 10/10 rating, the highest possible rating, with the prominent lawyer ranking web site, Avvo.com. He is also a member of The Justice Roundtable, an organization consisting of 100 of the nation's highest personal injury lawyers.

The Demas Law Group is committed to achieving the best possible results for its customers. The primary objective is to serve the members of the community through open communication, compassion and strong ethical values. The personal injury attorneys at Demas Law Group offer specialized legal skills, experience and dedication and spend all their resources provide exceptional legal representation and personal service. Their track record of success includes numerous seven-figure settlements and judgments, and has earned them accolades of their peers and Community.

The Demas Law Group has an "AV" rating, the highest possible national rating from Martindale-Hubbell received. In addition, the company has received the highest marks for "adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and dedication".



View the original article here

Russia calculates the fees of the lawyer's death in prison

MOSCOW (AP) — the Russian top investigative body said on Monday it fell injured on a lawyer who announced the official corruption in Russia and then died in prison at the same time, the former suffering from pancreatitis is suspected to be the doctor.

Lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky had accused the officials of the Ministry of the Interior, using false tax documents to steal to 230 million dollars from the State. He was imprisoned for tax evasion in 2008 and died in custody in November 2009.

Private investigation concluded, Magnitsky was beaten and denied medical treatment in prison and accused the Government in order to be responsible for the absence of.

Magnitsky was Hermitage capital, an investment fund owned and run by William Browder, born in the United States, which has been banned in the Russian information security risk.

On Monday, the Russian Committee for the failure of investigations declined to charge Dr. Larisa Litvinova, it specifies the expiration of two years from the date of such probes.

Hermitage capital, sharply criticised the decision, calling it "hold no one responsible for Russia inside the reluctance on the part of the Administration, the most recent example of the" Magnitsky's death.

"By forgoing against Ms. Litvinova Russian scientists have refused to acknowledge that Sergei Magnitsky had been detained, the crime, which is the 10-year limitation, tortured," investment fund said in a statement.

The lawyer's death was seen as the litmus paper of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in relation to cement the rule of Russia. In Russia, will investors have said the arguments against torture: the death of the Magnitsky and highlight the corruption and the arbitrary nature of the Russian legal system.

Magnitsky's death, Medvedev pledged to personally research, which has been more than two years, and must be wrapped up later this month.

But on Monday, the Committee said the investigations it has closed the Litvinova, medical, Magnitsky died, because the statue of limitations in Butyrskaya prison. He was charged with negligence, which led to the death, even though the prison Magnitsky's Deputy Chief, Dmitry Kratov was charged with negligence. The fee is removed against the Kratov on Monday.

Magnitsky's family and colleagues has been accused of delaying the probe, and the collection of only the perpetrators, and those who may be ordered by the authorities of the persecution of lawyer.

In response to these claims, it is clear from the investigations, the Committee said on Monday that the probe has taken so long to long medical procedures, as well as the fact that the Kratov were both Litvinova and was in hospital for two months in the last year of the unexplained reasons.

In the vicinity of the statue of limitations, Litvinova "was truncated to Medvedev: n changes intended to reduce crime, which causes the criminal responsibility of criminal law. Medvedev proposed changes in response to the criticism of business men in the treatment of jailed, which was largely inspired by the Magnitsky's case.

Researchers have recently again in tax evasion probe against Magnitsky, even if he is dead, saying that it gives to his relatives the opportunity to remove their name. But his family objected, saying it has never asked for such a possibility.

Posted on its website Monday night, a solution to the Russian Supreme Court declined to review the petition questioning the legality of Posthumous tax evasion probe, because he is not a Contracting Party to the Magnitsky's mother. The Constitutional Court shall also determine the legality of the new studies.


View the original article here

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Injured fruitpackers in fatal M5 crash call in the lawyers - Halesowen News

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Injured fruitpackers in fatal M5 crash call in the lawyers (From Halesowen News) Jump to main contentNewsSport Weather forecast

Mobile site News feed E-Newsletters Site map Register Log in Halesowen NewsInjured fruitpackers in fatal M5 crash call in the lawyers (From Halesowen News)

Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting HL NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us

Search: NewsSportLeisureInfoYour SayNewsXtrae EditionsFamilyAdvertisingDirectoryBuy & SellDatingCarsHomesJobsLocalDudley Council NoticeboardBusiness DailyNationalBlack Country NewsLettersClubs & SocietiesBlogs 2012
Halesowen News ? News ? Local ? Local RSS Feed
Injured fruitpackers in fatal M5 crash call in the lawyers 1:16pm Monday 2nd April 2012 in Local

FRUITPACKERS on the coach involved in horror fatal M5 crash near Halesowen last weekend could be in for a big payday.

Several of the 35 injured survivors have already instructed personal injury lawyers Claim Today Solicitors to act on their behalf despite fearing they could lose their job if they seek damages.

Rob Bhol CTS Managing Director said: “A worrying picture is beginning to emerge concerning this extremely tragic incident. “We are obviously keen to speak to as many witnesses as possible about events running up to the M5 coach crash so we can build an effective case for our clients.“ He added: “We understand that many of the workers are reluctant to come forward because of fears for their job security but we want to reassure them that we will treat any information we are given with discretion and sensitivity and that there are laws in place to protect their individual employment rights.”

On Saturday, March 24 at 6am on the M5 near Halesowen a lorry crashed into a stationary coach full of fruitpackers being transported to work in Evesham.

Liaquat Ali, aged 35 and from Smethwick, was a passenger on the bus and died at the scene.

And 65-year-old lorry driver from Wells in Somerset, William Mapstone died in hospital.

The 49-year-old driver of the coach was arrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving and was bailed pending further enquires.

Police are still appealing for witnesses to the collision and anyone who saw the incident should contact them should call the West Midlands Police Collision Investigation Unit on 101.

Tweet Email Print this page Comment(0)

Comment now! Register or sign in below.

Log in with us Fields marked with * are mandatory.

*Email *Password Remember me Forgotten password ?
Forgotten email ?
FAQ ?

Or

Log in with More Local stories End of an era for Halesowen as fire station closes down Charity hero Blind Dave is new honorary freeman of Sandwell borough Elderly forced out as council shuts Halesowen care home Airport crews gear up for high-flying family event Easter services at Rowley Regis church Haden Hill Historical Society announce April meeting Court hears Kerry Smith's ex-boyfriend was dangerously jealous Rowley Regis park and ride scheme to be extended by Centro Magic in the air at Dudley museum Stourbridge changed forever after dramatic demolition Tweet Email Print this page Comment(0) Local Businesses Block list Most popular
Jobs

Find your next job now in the West Midlands
Search Now ?

? Dating

Make a date in the West Midlands Now!
Search Now ?

dating Homes

Homes for sale and to let in the West Midlands
Search Now ?

house Cars

Cars for sale throughout the West Midlands
Search Now ?

? NewsSportLeisureInfoYour SayNewsXtrae EditionsFamilyAdvertisingDirectoryBuy & SellDatingCarsHomesJobs
Contact Us Subscribe Photo Sales Advertise AdChoices AdChoices Archive Topics Announcements Site Map Buy & Sell
Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy ? Copyright 2001-2012 Newsquest Media Group A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network Newsquest site network E10918.DM_tag();

View the original article here

Monday, April 2, 2012

Two company injury lawyers recognized as Top 40 under 40 Trial lawyers in Virginia-PR Web (press release)

Virginia Beach, VA (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

The national Trial lawyers has selected Virginia injury attorneys Emily Mapp Brannon and Kevin Duffan, associates with the Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton law firm, for inclusion in the "Top 40 under 40 process lawyers in Virginia.

The national Trial lawyers Top 40 under 40 is a professional organization comprised of America's top young trial lawyers. Membership in the Top 40 under 40 Association is by invitation only and is limited to lawyers under the age of 40 who are chosen by a comprehensive selection process that includes peer nominations and third-party research. These lawyers have selected excelled in the courtroom, superior qualifications and leadership as young lawyers process are displayed.

This means in fact, Emily and Kevin are some of the best personal injury lawyers in Virginia under the age of 40.

Our law firm Virginia personal injury is proud that Emily and Kevin were selected for this prestigious honor. They represent our company commitment to excellence and willingness to advocate for our client's rights from the first pleading quite at a jury trial, if necessary.

Emily and Kevin's performance comes on the heels of the company is selected as one of the best personal injury law firms in Virginia for 2011-2012 & by U.s. News World Report.



View the original article here

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies-insurance daily

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Sacramento personal injury lawyers to Open Demas Law Group-PR Web (press release)

Sacramento, California (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

A team of Sacramento injury lawyers goes on a new course by forming the Demas Law Group. The company began operation under this name in March of 2012. The firms primary mission is to serve the Sacramento Community in a wide range of personal injury matters. The company consists of Sacramento personal injury lawyers that decades of collective experience helping injured clients in California.

The Demas Law Group will be led by John n. Demas. Mr. Demas has successfully handled personal injury cases in the Sacramento area for twenty years, including wrongful death, catastrophic damage and claims for defective products. He has represented victims of car accidents, trucking, and construction. Mr. Demas has a reputation with lawyers, clients and insurance companies as well as a vigilant advocate for injured victims. His skill and expertise have resulted in some of the largest judgments in Sacramento County history. He has been selected by his peers as Super lawyer for 2009, 2010 and 2011 Northern California, an exclusive honor limited to less than 5% of all lawyers, and approximately 1% of plaintiff personal injury lawyers. He was recently recognized as the questioning Attorney/advocate of the year by the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association, in recognition of his extraordinary trial results and intrepid work in advocating for the rights of consumers. In addition, Mr. Demas has granted membership to The American Board of Trial advocates (ABOTA), and has a 10/10 rating, the highest possible rating, with the prominent lawyer ranking web site, Avvo.com. He is also a member of The Justice Roundtable, an organization consisting of 100 of the nation's highest personal injury lawyers.

The Demas Law Group is committed to achieving the best possible results for its customers. The primary objective is to serve the members of the community through open communication, compassion and strong ethical values. The personal injury attorneys at Demas Law Group offer specialized legal skills, experience and dedication and spend all their resources provide exceptional legal representation and personal service. Their track record of success includes numerous seven-figure settlements and judgments, and has earned them accolades of their peers and Community.

The Demas Law Group has an "AV" rating, the highest possible national rating from Martindale-Hubbell received. In addition, the company has received the highest marks for "adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and dedication".



View the original article here

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Two company injury lawyers recognized as Top 40 under 40 Trial lawyers in Virginia-PR Web (press release)

Virginia Beach, VA (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

The national Trial lawyers has selected Virginia injury attorneys Emily Mapp Brannon and Kevin Duffan, associates with the Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton law firm, for inclusion in the "Top 40 under 40 process lawyers in Virginia.

The national Trial lawyers Top 40 under 40 is a professional organization comprised of America's top young trial lawyers. Membership in the Top 40 under 40 Association is by invitation only and is limited to lawyers under the age of 40 who are chosen by a comprehensive selection process that includes peer nominations and third-party research. These lawyers have selected excelled in the courtroom, superior qualifications and leadership as young lawyers process are displayed.

This means in fact, Emily and Kevin are some of the best personal injury lawyers in Virginia under the age of 40.

Our law firm Virginia personal injury is proud that Emily and Kevin were selected for this prestigious honor. They represent our company commitment to excellence and willingness to advocate for our client's rights from the first pleading quite at a jury trial, if necessary.

Emily and Kevin's performance comes on the heels of the company is selected as one of the best personal injury law firms in Virginia for 2011-2012 & by U.s. News World Report.



View the original article here

Friday, March 30, 2012

Sacramento personal injury lawyers to Open Demas Law Group-PR Web (press release)

Sacramento, California (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

A team of Sacramento injury lawyers goes on a new course by forming the Demas Law Group. The company began operation under this name in March of 2012. The firms primary mission is to serve the Sacramento Community in a wide range of personal injury matters. The company consists of Sacramento personal injury lawyers that decades of collective experience helping injured clients in California.

The Demas Law Group will be led by John n. Demas. Mr. Demas has successfully handled personal injury cases in the Sacramento area for twenty years, including wrongful death, catastrophic damage and claims for defective products. He has represented victims of car accidents, trucking, and construction. Mr. Demas has a reputation with lawyers, clients and insurance companies as well as a vigilant advocate for injured victims. His skill and expertise have resulted in some of the largest judgments in Sacramento County history. He has been selected by his peers as Super lawyer for 2009, 2010 and 2011 Northern California, an exclusive honor limited to less than 5% of all lawyers, and approximately 1% of plaintiff personal injury lawyers. He was recently recognized as the questioning Attorney/advocate of the year by the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association, in recognition of his extraordinary trial results and intrepid work in advocating for the rights of consumers. In addition, Mr. Demas has granted membership to The American Board of Trial advocates (ABOTA), and has a 10/10 rating, the highest possible rating, with the prominent lawyer ranking web site, Avvo.com. He is also a member of The Justice Roundtable, an organization consisting of 100 of the nation's highest personal injury lawyers.

The Demas Law Group is committed to achieving the best possible results for its customers. The primary objective is to serve the members of the community through open communication, compassion and strong ethical values. The personal injury attorneys at Demas Law Group offer specialized legal skills, experience and dedication and spend all their resources provide exceptional legal representation and personal service. Their track record of success includes numerous seven-figure settlements and judgments, and has earned them accolades of their peers and Community.

The Demas Law Group has an "AV" rating, the highest possible national rating from Martindale-Hubbell received. In addition, the company has received the highest marks for "adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and dedication".



View the original article here

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Injury lawyers: explaining whiplash claims - Banking Times

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson is an injury claims lawyer working at The Injury Lawyers, who explains that while whiplash is a clear and serious issue, the whole subject has become badly distorted through insurance companies selling customer details for referral fees.

Like Tony Blair and his “Education, Education, Education” speech at the start of Labours last bout of parliamentary power, the topic we’re looking at here is “Whiplash, Whiplash, Whiplash” – it’s all about whiplash!

You have heard all about it in the news, and you may well have experienced it yourself, or know someone who has made a whiplash claim. The fact that remains in today’s society is the real negative viewpoint people have of this injury. So I decided, as a representative of a firm of lawyers that deal with whiplash, and a whiplash sufferer myself, to give you some enlightenment from the other side of the coin; because all you will hear about in the press is everyone slating the validity of whiplash as an injury.

Is whiplash even a real injury?

Well, yes, of course it is. If you grab an elastic band and stretch it, it returns back to normal so long as you haven’t pulled it too far. Which is kind of my point; stretch it too far and you will either shred it or snap it. Pull anything too much and it will eventually ‘give’ and break or stretch too much and cause damage.

There are apparently over 50 muscles in the back structure alone. Now, imagine 50 muscles being stretched beyond their normal range of movement, and hey-ho, you have whiplash! It’s not always just a little bit of an ache that goes away over a few days; it can sometimes be a severely debilitating injury that is caused by the muscles in the neck, back, and shoulders being pulled beyond their normal range of movement.

Upon an impact or a sudden stop, you are thrown forwards and backwards within the restraint of your seatbelt, assuming you are wearing one. This lurch forward is what stretches the many ligaments and tendons in the neck, shoulders and back structure beyond their normal range of movement, resulting in obvious damage to them. You can pull a muscle in your leg from playing football – a similar principle applies. So yes, whiplash is a real injury.

But we hear too often in the news about it being difficult to diagnose. I’m not sure why really, because whiplash is diagnosable – there are physical symptoms that can be felt. A person with whiplash may have stiff areas in the neck, shoulders and back which are definable to the human touch. The stiffness is caused by the damage which was caused by the overstretching of the muscles. Yes, there are occasions where it may be more difficult to see; but with a little common sense and deductive logic, apply the earlier principle of muscles being overstretched in an impact or a sudden stop and its quite clear to understand you can end up with a whiplash injury.

When it comes to making a claim, the injury must be medically assessed to prove its validity. An assessment with a qualified medical expert who has access to the Claimants medical records is a common part of the claims process. A report is completed and the expert will give their opinion as to the severity of the injury and the affects it has had on the Claimants life. The expert is entirely independent – their duty is to the court, NOT to the Claimant; so there is no bias. They get paid for their work either way, and they must give their professionally qualified opinion. They will only agree with what is reasonable in the report.

Surrounding the “whiplash epidemic” or “whiplash problem” as its often termed is the government’s movement to ban personal injury referral fees that are thought to be at the centre of a surge in whiplash claims over the last decade. However, there appears to be a cultural trend that has crossed over in to the campaign to rid the UK of the referral fee system which focuses on whiplash itself being the problem; which it isn’t.

Yes, whiplash claims can be sometimes difficult to prove; however, former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw has lost a great deal of respect for the following quotation from a speech regarding the bill in the House of Commons last year:

“Often such claims are for whiplash, which is not so much an injury, more a profitable invention of the human imagination—undiagnosable except by third-rate doctors in the pay of the claims management companies or personal injury lawyers”

This is what I will professionally term as a “seriously stupid statement”. The above is not true. As I said earlier, whiplash IS diagnosable, and it CAN be felt to the human touch. The experts that are instructed are not “in the pay of the claims management companies or personal injury lawyers”; in fact, their fees are recovered from the insurers, and the expert, who must be independent, must be agreed with the insurers before instruction. The insurers have the right to object to any proposed experts, and can even get their own medical evidence for claims!

Quickly turning to my own experience of whiplash, which I am still suffering from since last May (although one reason may be an unrelated leg injury I have from this January that may have exacerbated the whiplash through the use of crutches for months), I was seen by a Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon with all the qualifications to boot.

I therefore ask the right honourable gentleman speaker Mr Jack Straw if he is seriously suggesting that the Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon I saw for my medical report whom confirmed my whiplash is nothing more than a “third-rate doctor”!??

Furthermore, was the qualified physiotherapist I received treatment from also some useless “third-rate” practitioner whom just wasted her time poking and prodding my back for no good reason?? Were these two medical professionals both lying when they could feel the damage in my back muscles which I still get trouble with today, and never had issues with prior to the accident? Am I, Mr Straw, also lying through my back teeth because I want a quick cash payout for an invented injury?

Are you calling us all liars, and claiming that the firm I work for is fraudulently suing the bus company responsible for my injuries??

The real issue is simple – due to the referral fee system that insurance companies push people in to making claims through, we see a higher proportion of fraudulent or frivolous claims. There could easily be a small minority who could try and “milk the system” but that doesn’t mean all whiplash sufferers are doing the same. There are, and have been in the past, unbelievable amounts of people cheating the benefits system, for one example. The simple fact is that these are not symptoms of a “whiplash problem” but rather more they are the common symptoms associated with anything that involves financial gain in today’s society. You simply cannot escape fraud!

So what about the lawyers claiming high fees for whiplash claims? Well as a matter of fact we lawyers are capped to restricted legal fees, so that’s not really an issue. The fact does remain however that a lawyer is needed to protect the rights of the Claimant from being fobbed off by the insurers.

Third Party Capture is a term used to describe the insurers of the party at fault contacting the victim to settle the claim directly. The amount of times we get calls from people who have been suffering for two months and the insurers are sticking to their offer of £500.00 is unreal. The insurers know full well that a two month whiplash injury is worth more than £500.00, yet they see the opportunity to save themselves some money by purposefully trying to under settle a claim. Where is the justice in that?

In the past, insurers would pay independent companies and agents to settle claims directly with the innocent victims. The cheaper the claim was settled for, the more commission these agents would receive. It’s no secret that insurers have, and will continue to try and save money at the expense of the victims to which they are legally responsible for paying out. Think of it like this – you get your vehicle assessed for valuation of repairs before you settle the claim with the insurers; why wouldn’t you do the same for your injury? This simply requires a lawyer.

So how do we solve the problem?

Well, realistically, there isn’t a problem per-se. There are no more problems than there already are in other situations in life were people can “milk the system”. All this talk of cutting whiplash claims and making it harder to make a claim will only serve to be an injustice for the majority genuine whiplash victims who have suffered at the hands of a negligent driver. We have car insurance for the sole purposes of making a claim from – it’s there to be used! Perhaps what we should be focusing on is making sure there are less dangerous drivers on the road, and improving safety in vehicles to prevent or reduce the damage a whiplash injury can cause. Research is already underway in to ways that vehicles can prevent a whiplash injury, or reduce the affects.

We can of course continue to improve efficiency in the way claims are dealt with, but the new system we have had since 2010 whereby legal fees are further reduced and claims are dealt with through an online portal system is pretty efficient.

So, to our dear government who are content on making life cheaper in today’s harsh economy (irrelevant of whether it’s for the votes or for the greater good!) – look closer and focus on the real problem at hand! We know insurers are the top conspirators for referral fees and pushing people in to making claims, so step one is complete the legal ban, and step two is making the process even more efficient.

Category: Banking News, Opinion


View the original article here

Strauss-Kahn lawyers fight against prostitutes claim - CNN

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Ex-International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn is not allowed to have contact with others involved in the probe.Ex-International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn is not allowed to have contact with others involved in the probe.Attorney: There is no evidence Strauss-Kahn knew women at sex parties were paidOther suspects say the former IMF chief did not know, Henri Leclerc saysStrauss-Kahn is warned he is being investigated for "aggravated pimping"French police are investigating a high-profile prostitution ring in Lille

Paris (CNN) -- Lawyers for Dominique Strauss-Kahn pushed back Tuesday against allegations that he facilitated prostitution in France, saying there was "no significant evidence" the former International Monetary Fund chief knew young women at parties he attended were being paid for sex.

Other suspects held over an investigation into prostitution centered around the city of Lille "said that Dominique Strauss-Kahn did not know that these women were being paid," Strauss-Kahn's lawyer Henri Leclerc said in a news conference.

"We hear that these women say otherwise. Well, no! I can tell you these women do not say otherwise," he said.

Strauss-Kahn was formally warned Monday that he is under investigation for "aggravated pimping" for accusations that he participated in a prostitution ring, prosecutors said.

He is not allowed to have contact with other people involved in the investigation, nor is he permitted to talk to the media about the case. Strauss-Kahn was released under a €100,000 ($133,000) bail, according to prosecutors.

Strauss-Kahn is now at a point in the French legal system that comes after an arrest and before formal charges are filed.

He faces allegations of habitual involvement in a prostitution racket.

The description of the alleged crime as "aggravated" means it took place on a regular and involved basis, and "pimping" means facilitating a prostitution operation, not just being a customer.

Leclerc said it was possible to question his client's morals, but that he had not broken the law.

"We can criticize in terms of virtue, in terms of how a man should conduct himself," the lawyer said. "But in reality, this is just unruly conduct. You can hate it, you may not find it virtuous -- everyone is entitled to their own opinion -- but it is not a crime."

Frederique Beaulieu, another lawyer for Strauss-Kahn, said Tuesday: "You have to remember that in our country having relations with a prostitute is not a crime."

While prostitution is not illegal in France, profiting from the prostitution of another person is against the law, according to the French Penal Code. Authorities are also investigating whether corporate funds were used to pay for the prostitutes.

Leclerc said in December that there was no evidence that such funds were misappropriated.

Last month, Strauss-Kahn was held for more than 24 hours by police in Lille and questioned about alleged involvement in the prostitution ring.

His attorneys released a statement in November calling the allegations against their client "unhealthy, sensationalist and not without a political agenda."

The prostitution probe, nicknamed the "Carlton Affair" by the French press, kicked off in October.

It centers around the city of Lille, w3here investigators began looking into claims that luxury hotels, including the Carlton, served as a base for a high-profile prostitution network.

In December, Strauss-Kahn's attorney Leclerc acknowledged in an interview with radio station Europe1 that his client attended sex parties, but said Strauss-Kahn was unaware the women in attendance were prostitutes.

A hotel manager and four other men were arrested late last year in connection with the investigation.

The Carlton Affair continues a string of sexual allegations against Strauss-Kahn. He has not been convicted of any crime.

One of the sex scandals torpedoed his expected run for the French presidency this year. He stepped down from the top job at the IMF after that incident, in which a New York hotel maid accused him of sexual assault and attempted rape in May. He denied the accusation.

The case ultimately fell apart after prosecutors decided they could not be sure about the credibility of the alleged victim, despite forensic evidence that showed a sexual encounter had occurred.

Strauss-Kahn also faced allegations of attempted rape from a young French writer. Tristane Banon filed a complaint, alleging a 2003 attack, though it could not be pursued because of a statute of limitations.

Strauss-Kahn denied the allegations and has since filed a countersuit in France, alleging slander.

CNN's Brian Walker contributed to this report.

ADVERTISEMENTupdated 6:37 PM EDT, Tue March 27, 2012 Britain's Prince Harry has moved into the same London residence where his brother William lives with his new wife Kate, CNN can reveal.updated 8:17 PM EDT, Tue March 27, 2012 A British businessman who was found dead in his Chinese hotel room emerges as a key link in a story of intrigue, mystery and betrayal.updated 10:58 AM EDT, Mon March 26, 2012 Analyst Richard Chasdi says that nations that empower proxy groups are risking total disaster in a nuclear age. In a conversation about a European missile system caught on an open mic, President Barack Obama asks Russia's Dmitry Medvedev for space.updated 5:47 AM EDT, Tue March 27, 2012 Pope Benedict XVI was coming to Mexico for the very first time and the sense of anticipation was great. It was to be the pope's first trip to Spanish-speaking Latin America too. updated 8:24 PM EDT, Sun March 25, 2012 Oscar-winning director James Cameron plunges to the deepest point in the oceans, tweeting from his submersible during the process.updated 11:11 AM EDT, Mon March 26, 2012 Song Ee Han agonized over a decision: Would she leave her youngest child behind while she and her daughters escaped North Korea?updated 9:50 PM EDT, Sun March 25, 2012 Song Byeok had every reason to be pleased with his success. A gift for drawing led to a prestigious career as a propaganda artist.updated 9:12 AM EDT, Fri March 23, 2012 Did French intelligence services miss vital clues as Mohammed Merah showed signs of growing radicalization? updated 12:08 PM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 One analysts says Sarkozy may be keen to keep the focus on security and the Toulouse attacks -- issues on which he looks strong.updated 12:11 PM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 The Toulouse shootings refocus fears on trained attackers who are determined, living legally in the West and operating alone.updated 9:40 AM EDT, Thu March 22, 2012 How an acclaimed creates masks, thrones and figures out of weapons used in conflict. Most popular stories right nowADVERTISEMENT

View the original article here

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies - Insurance Daily

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Zimbabwe Lawyers Want Treason Charges Against Activists Dropped - Voice of America

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
In the first treason trial to be held in the second city of Bulawayo, the three activists, Paul Siwela, John Gazi and Charles Thomas, are being accused of distributing fliers calling for an uprising against the government

Lawyers representing three activist members of the Zimbabwe pressure group, Mthwakazi Liberation Front, say they will apply for dismissal of the case because of inconsistent evidence.

In the first treason trial to be held in the second city of Bulawayo, the three activists, Paul Siwela, John Gazi and Charles Thomas, are being accused of distributing fliers calling for an uprising against the government. They deny the charge.

Lawyer Lucas Nkomo tells VOA's Chris Gande the case against the three has literally crumbled after two star witnesses gave inconsistent evidence.

“The first two witnesses denied that they had ever seen the accused people thereby weakening the case against the trio,” said Nkomo.

The state alleges that the fliers the three were distributing urged the people Matabeleland to rise against the government.

The three argue the state misinterpreted the message on their fliers.

Nkomo says witnesses who have taken the stand so far have not only weakened the state case but showed that no crime was committed.

“The arresting officers also gave conflicting? and inconsistent evidence that was not of any assistance to the state case,” said Nkomo.

Justice Ndou, sitting with assessors Jongilizwe Sobantu and Phanuel Damba, have postponed the case to April 23.


View the original article here

Monday, March 26, 2012

Personal injury lawyers & lawyers in the U.S. industry market research report ...-PR Web (press release)

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) March 13, 2012

Income for the personal injury lawyers and attorneys industry are expected to grow to $ 26.7 billion annually, 1.9% in the five years to 2012. In this period, the industry has benefited from an increase in the average age of the u.s. population, which led to the number of visits to the doctor has to rise. According to IBISWorld industry analyst Kevin Culbert contributes "the aging of the u.s. population to growth of the industry because older individuals are more prone to accidents slip-and-fall, which can result in personal injury cases." Besides, the subsequent growth in the number of doctor visit results in a greater number of malpractice suits. This factor is expected to contribute to the sales growth in 2012.

Unlike many industries that has the industry declined during the recession, personal injury attorneys and lawyers a countercyclical nature to it. During the five years until 2012, the number of car accidents has dropped the United States is expected to reach 1.4% per year to 5.6 million. Also, the number of workplace deaths declined on a year basis of 3.2% to 4,801. "In spite of this," says Culbert, "the recession has created cash-strapped individuals are more likely to be a personal injury case in case of an injury." As such, make the decrease of potential customers not the poor performance of the industry during the recession.

In the five years until 2017, is 2.0% to 29.5 billion dollar industry annually grow revenue forecast. During that time, the industry operators will benefit from an increase in revenue generated by structured settlements, which have become more popular over the last five years. Structured settlements are a scheme in which damages be paid off over a period of time instead of all at once. During the recession was more popular structured settlements because many defendants were not able to pay damages in a lump sum. As such, the industry operators a large part of the revenue from past settlements generating in the years going forward. While structured settlements boost industry profit margins in the next five years, will help the growth of profits of the industry will be restrained by increasing price competition. An inflow of law students, who pursued degrees instead of the labour market, enter will lead to higher competition and a boost in the number of small businesses. The industry will remain very fragmented, with the average company with only three employees. For more information, visit personal injury lawyers & lawyers in the IBISWorld report of the U.S. in the U.S. industry page.

IBISWorld follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/IBISWorld
IBISWorld friend on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/IBISWorld/121347533189

IBISWorld industry report key topics

This industry includes practitioners of legal professions (i.e. lawyers or lawyers) that essentially the practice of personal injury law.

Industry performance
Executive Summary
Main external Drivers
Current performance
Industry-Outlook
Industry life cycle
Products & markets
Supply Chain
Products & services
Major markets
Globalisation & trade
Business Locations
Competitive landscape
Concentration in the market share
Key success factors
Cost structure Benchmarks
Entry Barriers
Large companies
Operating Conditions
Capital intensity
Key statistics
Industry data
Annual change
Important proportions

About IBISWorld Inc.
Acknowledged as the most trusted independent source of the nation of industry and market research, IBISWorld offers an extensive database of unique information and analysis on every u.s. industry. With an extensive online portfolio, appreciated for its depth and scope, rest the company clients with the insight to better business decisions. In addition to its headquarters in Los Angeles and IBISWorld serves a range of business, professional service and government organizations by more than 10 locations worldwide. For more information, visit http://www.ibisworld.com or call 1-800-330-3772.



View the original article here

In Health Care Case, Lawyers Train for 3-Day Marathon - New York Times

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Last week, there were so many of the mock arguments that lawyers call moot courts that they threatened to exhaust something that had never been thought in short supply: Washington lawyers willing to pretend to be Supreme Court justices.

The problem, said Paul D. Clement, who represents the 26 states challenging the law, was not just the length of the arguments the court will hear, but the variety of topics to be addressed.

The law itself is a sprawling revision of the health care system meant to provide coverage to tens of millions of previously uninsured Americans by imposing new requirements on states, employers and insurance companies and, through what has been called the individual mandate, by requiring most Americans to obtain insurance or pay a penalty.

The decision in the case will have enormous practical consequences for how health care is delivered in the United States. It is likely to land in June, with large repercussions for both Mr. Obama and his Republican challenger just before the two parties hold their nominating conventions.

The justices have broken the case into four discrete issues, scheduling a separate session for each, for a total of six hours, the most in one case in more than 40 years. Mr. Clement, like his principal adversary, Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr., will be arguing three times.

Walter Dellinger, who was acting solicitor general in the Clinton administration, said he was worried about “the enormous endurance challenge this will be for Verrilli and Clement.” Mr. Dellinger, who has argued more than 20 cases in the Supreme Court, said making even a single 30-minute presentation is draining.

“The day or two after a Supreme Court argument, I just basically collapse,” Mr. Dellinger said.

The central issue in the case, to be argued for two hours on Tuesday, is whether the individual mandate is constitutional.

But first, on Monday, the justices will hear 90 minutes of arguments from three lawyers about whether they should be hearing the case at all.

An 1867 federal law, the Anti-Injunction Act, bars suits “for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax.” The federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., and a prominent federal appeals court judge in Washington have issued opinions saying that the 1867 law means a decision in the health care case must be deferred until 2015, when Americans will first be penalized if they do not have health insurance.

But neither the Obama administration nor the parties challenging the law agree with that ruling. So the court appointed a Washington lawyer, Robert A. Long, to speak on behalf of that argument. The court makes such appointments every year or so, and the practice has been the subject of some skeptical academic commentary.

Mr. Long will be followed on Monday by Mr. Verrilli and a lawyer for the private challengers, Gregory G. Katsas.

The Obama administration initially agreed that the court could not rule on challenges to the law for a few more years, but it reversed course in the appeals courts. It has since relinquished other opportunities to slow down the case and insists it wants a prompt decision.

Mr. Long was one of three lawyers who presented mock arguments in the grand ceremonial courtroom at the Supreme Court Institute at the Georgetown University Law Center. On other days, the moot court program there helped prepare Mr. Clement, twice, as well as Michael A. Carvin, who represents private challengers to the law.

Mr. Clement and Mr. Carvin will face Mr. Verrilli on Tuesday for the main event, the argument over whether the requirement to obtain insurance was authorized by the Constitution as a regulation of interstate commerce or by the power to levy taxes. The administration says the health care law is well within the powers granted by the Constitution, while the challengers say it plainly exceeds what the federal government may do.

For Wednesday, the court has scheduled a double feature.

In the morning, the justices will hear 90 minutes of arguments about what should happen if they strike down the mandate. The federal appeals court in Atlanta, whose decision is under review, ruled that it was possible to remove just the mandate and leave the balance of the law intact.

As with the 1867 law, neither side agrees with that ruling. So here, too, the court has appointed an outside lawyer, H. Bartow Farr III, to argue the point.

Mr. Clement will contend that the entire law must fall. A colleague of Mr. Verrilli’s in the solicitor general’s office, Edwin S. Kneedler, will argue for a middle ground, saying that most of the law should stand but that two other provisions — one forbidding insurers to turn away applicants, the other barring them from taking account of pre-existing conditions — are intertwined with the mandate and would have to fall along with it.

On Wednesday afternoon, the two main lawyers, Mr. Verrilli and Mr. Clement, will return for a one-hour encore, this time to argue over whether Congress exceeded its constitutional authority in expanding the eligibility and coverage thresholds that states must adopt to remain eligible for Medicaid, the federal-state program that provides health care to poor and disabled people.

There is room for only about 400 people in the courtroom, and prominent lawyers and politicians have been scrambling for tickets. The court has set aside about 60 seats for members of the public, and the line started forming on Friday morning.

Emmarie Huetteman contributed reporting.


View the original article here

Friday, March 16, 2012

North Carolina personal injury lawyers of & Cochran Sponsor MDA ... Hardison-PR Web (press release)

Raleigh, NC (PRWEB) March 15, 2012

The North Carolina personal injury lawyers of & Cochran, lawyers meet again, Hardison sponsors of the Muscular Dystrophy Association/triangle muscle walk.

The event was set on Saturday, 24 March, on Fayetteville Street in downtown Raleigh. Registration begins at 10 am the walk will kick off at 11 a.m. Lunch is served 12 noon to registered participants. Local band more rhythm will offer live music.

"We are honored to serve as sponsors of the MDA muscle walk, that triangle/a great success," said North Carolina personal injury and workers ' compensation lawyer Benjamin t. Cochran, the managing partner of & Hardison Cochran.

In addition to representatives of North Carolina victims of accidents and injuries, the company has a long history of community involvement. Each year, the company sponsors a wide variety of non-profit groups and charity events.

"The MDA/triangle muscle walk helps to raise funds for important research and services. It also helps to raise awareness of neuromuscular diseases, "said Cochran. "Above all it gives hope and support for muscular dystrophy patients and their families.

"If someone would like to see what the MDA is all about, we welcome you to join us on 24 March in downtown Raleigh."

The MDA/triangle muscle walk pays tribute to those with one of 40 diseases of the muscle damage. The event is a family-oriented gather. It offers light exercise for all concerned – children, adults, grandparents, students, corporate teams and more.

Of the MDA Eastern North Carolina District organises the event. The district's Office is located in Raleigh. It serves 18 provinces with more than 1,100 residents living with a form of muscular dystrophy.

Money raised by events such as the benefits triangle muscle walk these individuals. It raises funds for extensive patient service programs through MDA clinics at Duke and the University of North Carolina. The funds also support ongoing research worldwide and a week-long summer camp for children and young adults.

For more information about organizing or participating in a team or making a donation, visit the website or call (919) muscle walk triangle 783-0222.

"We hope that local companies will greatly meet, organize teams or other sponsors to consider charitable contributions MDA," said Cochran. "Every little bit helps."

About & Hardison Cochran, lawyers

& Hardison Cochran, lawyers, is a highly respected North Carolina personal injury, workers ' compensation and social security disability law firm with offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville, Dunn, New Bern, Southern Pines and Wilmington. The firms practice areas include car accidents, truck accidents, motorcycle accidents, boating accidents, dog bites, dangerous drugs, defective medical devices, nursing home abuse and negligence and traffic violations. The firm free calls at (800) 434-8399 or using the company online contact form for more information.



View the original article here

Personal injury lawyers & lawyers in the U.S. industry market research report ...-PR Web (press release)

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) March 13, 2012

Income for the personal injury lawyers and attorneys industry are expected to grow to $ 26.7 billion annually, 1.9% in the five years to 2012. In this period, the industry has benefited from an increase in the average age of the u.s. population, which led to the number of visits to the doctor has to rise. According to IBISWorld industry analyst Kevin Culbert contributes "the aging of the u.s. population to growth of the industry because older individuals are more prone to accidents slip-and-fall, which can result in personal injury cases." Besides, the subsequent growth in the number of doctor visit results in a greater number of malpractice suits. This factor is expected to contribute to the sales growth in 2012.

Unlike many industries that has the industry declined during the recession, personal injury attorneys and lawyers a countercyclical nature to it. During the five years until 2012, the number of car accidents has dropped the United States is expected to reach 1.4% per year to 5.6 million. Also, the number of workplace deaths declined on a year basis of 3.2% to 4,801. "In spite of this," says Culbert, "the recession has created cash-strapped individuals are more likely to be a personal injury case in case of an injury." As such, make the decrease of potential customers not the poor performance of the industry during the recession.

In the five years until 2017, is 2.0% to 29.5 billion dollar industry annually grow revenue forecast. During that time, the industry operators will benefit from an increase in revenue generated by structured settlements, which have become more popular over the last five years. Structured settlements are a scheme in which damages be paid off over a period of time instead of all at once. During the recession was more popular structured settlements because many defendants were not able to pay damages in a lump sum. As such, the industry operators a large part of the revenue from past settlements generating in the years going forward. While structured settlements boost industry profit margins in the next five years, will help the growth of profits of the industry will be restrained by increasing price competition. An inflow of law students, who pursued degrees instead of the labour market, enter will lead to higher competition and a boost in the number of small businesses. The industry will remain very fragmented, with the average company with only three employees. For more information, visit personal injury lawyers & lawyers in the IBISWorld report of the U.S. in the U.S. industry page.

IBISWorld follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/IBISWorld
IBISWorld friend on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/IBISWorld/121347533189

IBISWorld industry report key topics

This industry includes practitioners of legal professions (i.e. lawyers or lawyers) that essentially the practice of personal injury law.

Industry performance
Executive Summary
Main external Drivers
Current performance
Industry-Outlook
Industry life cycle
Products & markets
Supply Chain
Products & services
Major markets
Globalisation & trade
Business Locations
Competitive landscape
Concentration in the market share
Key success factors
Cost structure Benchmarks
Entry Barriers
Large companies
Operating Conditions
Capital intensity
Key statistics
Industry data
Annual change
Important proportions

About IBISWorld Inc.
Acknowledged as the most trusted independent source of the nation of industry and market research, IBISWorld offers an extensive database of unique information and analysis on every u.s. industry. With an extensive online portfolio, appreciated for its depth and scope, rest the company clients with the insight to better business decisions. In addition to its headquarters in Los Angeles and IBISWorld serves a range of business, professional service and government organizations by more than 10 locations worldwide. For more information, visit http://www.ibisworld.com or call 1-800-330-3772.



View the original article here